Impact of Artificial Insemination Technology Adoption on Milk Yield and Livelihoods of the Household in Saesie-Tsaedaemba District Eastern Zone, Tigray, Ethiopia
This study was aimed at the impact of AI technology on milk production and livelihoods of the farmers in Saesie-tsaedaemba District Eastern Zone, Tigray, Ethiopia. In the study area, AI is a proven technology that has been used for genetic improvement for more than 15 years. So far, there has been little empirical information about the impact of AI on milk yield and livelihoods of the households. The purpose of this paper is therefore to estimate the impact of AI technology on milk yield and household livelihoods. The study was a survey design that used both primary and secondary data sources. The three-stage sampling procedure was employed to select 204 respondents. Both descriptive statistics and econometric models were applied to analyze the data. The result of the logit model for matching shows that family size, training, literacy, access to extension service, mobile ownership, and supplementation of concentrated feed were important variables that had positively associated and significantly influenced the adoption of AI technology whereas, farmland size, distance to FTC and distance inseminator office had shown a negative relationship. The result of PSM indicates that adopters of AI technology are seemingly better-off than non-adopters in the majority of outcome indicators such as milk yield per cow per lactation, annual income of the household, total physical asset holding which is converted into cash and non-food expenses; implying that AI technology has a considerable impact on milk yield and livelihood of the farmers. Hence, intensive work such as training, better extension service, providing a reasonable incentive to AI technicians, especially during weekends and holidays, hardship and overtime allowances should be provided to improve the adoption of AI technology as a result to improve milk production and productivity, increase household income and achieving food security as well as overall improve wellbeing of the households.
Cite this paper
Gebre, Y. H. , Gebru, G. W. and Gebre, K. T. (2024). Impact of Artificial Insemination Technology Adoption on Milk Yield and Livelihoods of the Household in Saesie-Tsaedaemba District Eastern Zone, Tigray, Ethiopia. Open Access Library Journal, 11, e2406. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1112406.
Abera, Z. (2018) Review on Procedures and Utilization of Artifi-cial Insemination Technologies in Nekemte Semen and Liquid Nitrogen Produc-tion and Distribution Centre, Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Concepts of Dairy & Veterinary Sciences, 1, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.32474/cdvs.2018.01.000117
Duguma, B. (2021) Productive and Reproductive Performance of Crossbred and Indigenous Dairy Cows at Smallholdings in Selected Towns of Jimma Zone, Ethiopia. Animal Pro-duction Science, 61, 92-100. https://doi.org/10.1071/an19380
Worku, D., Alemayehu, K. and Melekote, M. (2016) Comparative Reproductive Perfor-mance Evaluation of Holstein Friesian Cattle Breeds in Two Different Agro Eco-logical Conditions, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Animal Genetic Re-sources/Ressources génétiques animales/Recursos genéticos animales, 58, 31-42. https://doi.org/10.1017/s2078633616000060
Mugisha, A., Kayiizi, V., Owiny, D. and Mburu, J. (2014) Breeding Services and the Factors Influencing Their Use on Smallholder Dairy Farms in Central Uganda. Veterinary Medicine International, 2014, Article ID: 169380. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/169380
Ingabire, M.C., Yonggong, L., Pesha, J.C. and Hardi, A. (2018) Factors Affecting Adoption of Artificial Insem-ination Technology by Small Dairy Farmers in Rwanda: A Case of Rwamagana District. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 9, 46-53.
Elijah Kiplangat, N. (2018) Farm Gate Dairy Milk Marketing Channel Choice in Kericho County, Kenya. Journal of World Economic Research, 7, 92-104. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jwer.20180703.11
Limenih, B. (2018) Women Farmers’ Adoption Challenges on Artificial Inseminations Service in Outskirt of Addis Ababa. International Journal of Agricultural Extension, 6, 81-88. https://doi.org/10.33687/ijae.006.02.2417
Tiruneh, S. and Tegene, F. (2018) Impacts of Climate Change on Livestock Production and Productivity and Different Adaptation Strategies in Ethiopia. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3, 52-58. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3i3.150
Sapkota, S., Gairhe, S., Ko-lakshyapati, M. and Upadhyay, N. (2016) Adoption of Artificial Insemination Technology in Dairy Animals and Impact on Milk Production: A Case Study in Nawalparasi and Chitwan Districts of Nepal. Nepalese Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 14, 80-85.
Bekele, A.D., Beuving, J. and Ruben, R. (2016) How African Households Shop: Evidence from Dairy Chains in Ethiopia. The European Journal of Development Research, 29, 806-826. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-016-0062-3
Kebebew, Y. and Bekele, T. (2018) Assessment of Efficiency and Major Constraint of Artificial Insemina-tion Service in Small Holder Dairy Farmers in and around Adama Town. Inter-national Journal of Advanced Research in Biological Sciences, 5, 88-99.
Ashebir, G. (2016) Status of Artificial Insemination in Tigray Re-gional State, “Constraints and Acceptability under Field Condition”. Journal of Dairy, Veterinary & Animal Research, 3, 91-95. https://doi.org/10.15406/jdvar.2016.03.00078
Ahmed, M. and Rahman, M. (2020) Local Climate Change Governance and Making Climate Resilient Town: The Role of Local Au-thorities. Research & Reviews: Journal of Architectural Designing, 2, 1-13.
Hadush, M. (2017) Implication of Animal Feed and Water Scarcity on Labor Allocation, Food Production and Per Capita Food Consumption in Tigrai Region, Ethiopia. Journal of Economic Development, 42, 59-93. https://doi.org/10.35866/caujed.2017.42.4.003
Habtewold, T.M. (2018) Adoption and Impact of Improved Agricultural Technologies on Rural Poverty. In: Heshmati, A. and Yoon, H., Eds., Economic Growth and Development in Ethiopia, Springer Singapore, 13-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8126-2_2
Rosenbaum, P.R. and Rubin, D.B. (1985) Constructing a Control Group Using Multivariate Matched Sampling Methods That Incorporate the Propensity Score. The American Statis-tician, 39, 33-38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.1985.10479383
Dehejia, R.H. and Wahba, S. (2002) Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal Studies. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 151-161. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465302317331982
Sianesi, B. (2004) An Evaluation of the Swedish System of Active Labor Market Programs in the 1990s. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 133-155. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465304323023723
Smith, J. and Todd, P. (2005) Does Matching Overcome LaLonde’s Critique of Nonexperimental Esti-mators? Journal of Econometrics, 125, 305-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011
Datta, A.K., Haider, M.Z. and Ghosh, S.K. (2018) Economic Analysis of Dairy Farming in Bangladesh. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 51, 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-018-1659-7